<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CJT &#187; cross-platform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cjtech.co.uk/index.php/tag/cross-platform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cjtech.co.uk</link>
	<description>Making Software Applications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:35:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>QT&#8217;s move to LGPL</title>
		<link>http://blog.cjtech.co.uk/index.php/2009/01/14/qt-move-to-lgpl/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cjtech.co.uk/index.php/2009/01/14/qt-move-to-lgpl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jethro Grassie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C/C++]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wxWidgets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cjtech.co.uk/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Nokia have made a change to the licensing model of its QT framework. The QT framework is a cross-platform C/C++ GUI framework developed by a Norwegian company name Trolltech which Nokia acquired last year. Anyone who has been doing cross-platform C++ applications with a GUI will have come across this framework and / or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cjtech.co.uk/index.php/2009/01/14/qt-move-to-lgpl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Native Client &#8211; first thoughts</title>
		<link>http://blog.cjtech.co.uk/index.php/2008/12/10/google-native-client/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cjtech.co.uk/index.php/2008/12/10/google-native-client/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 08:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jethro Grassie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native Client]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cjtech.co.uk/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new Google research project then&#8230; Native Client. This is being discussed all over the place, but here are my thoughts. Basically this boils down to a browser plug-in that will load and run compiled x86 modules (for want of a better word). This is native byte-code. What the Native Client plug-in adds is essentially [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cjtech.co.uk/index.php/2008/12/10/google-native-client/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JavaFX and its future</title>
		<link>http://blog.cjtech.co.uk/index.php/2008/12/08/javafx-future/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cjtech.co.uk/index.php/2008/12/08/javafx-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jethro Grassie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaFX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-device]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cjtech.co.uk/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, JavaFX v1.0 was released the other day and many people are quick to have a rant about it, so I may as well chip in too! We have lots of commercial Java experience, both on the server and the desktop, so have kept a keen eye on JavaFX since it was first announced &#8211; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cjtech.co.uk/index.php/2008/12/08/javafx-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cross-platform choices</title>
		<link>http://blog.cjtech.co.uk/index.php/2008/11/18/crossplatform-choices/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cjtech.co.uk/index.php/2008/11/18/crossplatform-choices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jethro Grassie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C/C++]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-platform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cjtech.co.uk/?p=59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are well known for our ability to create multi-platform, multi-device software applications, so here we spill some of the beans on how we achieve it. One of these things is language. There are two distinct ways of authoring cross-platform desktop applications: 1) Use a common runtime environment (e.g. Java &#8211; JRE) 2) Write code [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cjtech.co.uk/index.php/2008/11/18/crossplatform-choices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
